My long-term goal is to help shift how society understands canine care and companionship. This includes establishing clearer standards and professional pathways for companion animal caregiving, and improving outcomes and well-being for dogs by improving the human side of the relationship.
The research is the foundation, but the purpose is repair. Once gaps in care are seen clearly, they can be filled. If we understand what professional caregivers experience and need, we can build real education for the people who want to do this work—training in species-appropriate care, behavioral understanding, medical awareness, and the genuine emotional labor the role demands.
If we understand where owners are left unsupported, we can create the roles and services that actually meet those needs, rather than leaving people to sort real guidance from noise on their own. And if we understand how the market shapes and often misleads the way people care, we can support the standards and accountability the pet industry has long gone without—and stand behind the businesses and practitioners who genuinely want to help.
What I am ultimately working toward is legitimacy: for the care these relationships require, and for the people who provide it. We have built entire professions, credentials, and bodies of knowledge around caring for the humans we love who need extra support. The animals we now call family deserve the same seriousness.
This perspective does not oppose expert training, which is essential for working, assistance, sport, and therapy dogs; rather, it emphasizes that for strictly companion animals, relational attunement—not performance—is the primary foundation for a healthy human–canine bond.